| No. |
Control Point - description |
In Pantheon (Yes/No) |
Link to user manual in Pantheon |
Option |
Note |
| CB 1 |
TRACEABILITY
Traceability facilitates the recall/withdrawal od food and flower and ornamentals and enables customers to be provided with targeted and accurate information concerning implicated products.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 1.1 |
There is a documented identification and traceability system that allows GLOBAL GAP registered farm or, in a farmer group, and tracked forward to teh immediate customer. |
YES |
We can use serial numbers in Pantheon |
|
|
| CB 2 |
PROPAGATION MATERIAL
The choice of propagation material plays an important role in the production process and, by using the appropriate varieties , can help to reduce the number of fertilizer and plant protection product applications. The choice of propagation material is a precondition of good plant growth and product quality.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 2.1 |
Quality and Health
The purpose of variety registration is to provide growers, processors, retailers and government a means of oversight to ensure that health and safety requirements are met and that information related to the identity of the variety is available to regulators to prevent fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 2.1.1 |
A document (e.g. empty seed package or plant passport or packing list or invoice) that states as a minimum variety name, batch number, propagation material vendor and where available additional information on seed quality shall be available. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have option to Print Labels and we can use this option for printing declarations. |
|
|
| CB 2.1.2 |
When producer use reinstated varieties or rootstock, there are written documents available on request that prove that the propagation material used has been obtained in accordance to applicable local intellectual property right laws. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 2.1.3 |
A quality control system that contains a monitoring system for visible sings of pest and desires is in place and current records of the monitoring system shall be available. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have option Pest monitoring |
|
|
| CB 2.2 |
Chemical Treatments and dressings |
|
|
|
|
| CB 2.2.1 |
Records with the name (s) of the chemical product(s) used by the supplier on the propagation material ( e.g. maintaining records/seed packages, list with the names of the PPP used) are available on request. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have two option one si through receiving invoices nad second is thru reports that are made just for this record keeping. |
|
|
| CB 2.2.2 |
Records of all plant protection product treatments applied during the plant propagation period for in-hose plant nursery propagation are available and include localization. date, trade name and active ingredient, operator, authorized by justification , quantity and machinery used. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have Reports for PPP. |
|
|
| CB 2.3 |
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) |
|
|
|
|
| CB 2.3.1 |
The reinstated farm or group of registered farms have a copy of the legislation applicable in the country of production and company accordingly. Records shall be kept of the specific modification and/ or the unique identifier. |
NO |
|
|
|
| CB 2.3.2 |
If GMO cultivars and/or products derived from genetic modification are used, records of planting, use or production of GMO cultivars and/or products derived from modification are maintained. |
YES/NO |
We can use functionality for crop production, BUT we should probably adapt some functionality for GMO. Maybe will be enough just to do some switcher that is GMO. |
|
|
| CB 2.3.3 |
Documented evidence of communication shall be provided and shall allow verification that all material supplied to direct clients is according to customer requirements. |
YES |
In Pantheon we can do that thought serial numbers in Pantheon |
|
|
| CB 2.3.4 |
A written plan that explains how GM materials are handled and stored to minimize risk of contamination with conventional material and to maintain product integrity is available. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 2.3.5 |
A visual assessment of the integrity and identification of GMO crops storage shall be made. |
YES/NO |
In Pantheon we can recorded as separate warehouses |
|
|
| CB 3 |
SOIL MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION
Good soil husbandry ensures the long-term fertility of the soil, aids yield, and contributes to profitability. Not applicable in the case of crops that are not grown directly on the soil.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 3.1 |
The producer shall demonstrate that consideration has been given to the nutritional needs of the crop and to maintaining soil fertility. Records of analysis and/or crop-specific literature shall be available as evidence. |
YES/NO |
In Pantheon we can only enter data about soil analysis. Tools- Fertilization plan |
|
|
| CB 3.2 |
The types of soil are identified for each site, based on a soil profile or soil analysis or local (regional )cartographic soil -type map. |
NO |
|
Option GIS |
|
| CB 3.3 |
When rotations of annual crops to improve soil structure and minimize soil borne pests and diseases are done, this can be verified from planting date and/or plant protection product application records. Records shall exist for the previous 2-years rotation. |
NOT YET |
This will be the part of crop production in near future. |
|
|
| CB 3.4 |
There is evidence of techniques applied (e.g. use of deep-rooting green crops, drainage, subsoiling, user of low pressure tires,....) that are suitable for use on the land and, where possible, minimize, isolate or eliminate soil compaction,... |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 3.5 |
There is evidence of control practices and remedial measures(e.g. mulching, cross lie tehniques on slopes, drains, sowing grass or green fertilizers...) to minimize soil erosions |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 3.6 |
An analysis from the supply is carried out or recognized standard values are used, which take in to account the contents of NPK nutrients (nitrogen(N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K)) in organic fertilizer applied in order to avoid soil contamination. |
YES |
In Pantheon we can only enter data about soil analysis. Tools- Fertilization plan |
|
|
| CB 3.7 |
Records of sowing/planting, rate/ density and date shall be kept and be available. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks and Crop &Vegs - Cycles |
|
|
| CB 4 |
FERTILIZER APPLICATION
The fertilization decision-making process involves consideration of crop demands. Nutrients shall be available for crops in the growing substrate or soil and fertilization is often necessary. Correct application to optimize use and storage procedures to avoid loss and contamination shall be followed.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.1 |
Advice on Quantity and Type of Fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.1.1 |
Where the fertilizer records show that the technically responsible person determining quantity and type of the fertilizer. |
NO YET |
This data is not available in Pantheon yet. BUT will be on module Fertilization. |
|
|
| CB 4.2 |
Records of Application |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.2.1 |
Records shall be kept of all fertilizer applications, detailing the geographical area and the name of reference or the filed, orchard or greenhouse where the registered product crop is located. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.2.2 |
The exact dates (day, month and year) of the application are detailed in the records of all fertilizer applications. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.2.3 |
The trade name , type of fertilizer and concentrations are detailed in the records of all fertilizer applications. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.2.4 |
The amount of product to be applied in weight or volume relative to a unit of area or number of plants or unit of time per volume of fertigation is detailed in the records of all fertilizer application. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.2.5 |
The method and/or equipment used are detailed in the records of all fertilizer applications. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.2.6 |
The name of operator who has applied the fertilizer is detailed in the records of all fertilizer applications. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks and through tasks we can see what we have done on each field. Crop& Vegs -Tasks |
|
|
| CB 4.3 |
Fertilizer Storage |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.1 |
The minimum requirement is to prevent physical cross-contamination between fertilizers and plant protection product by using a physical barrier. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.2 |
The covered area is suitable to protect all inorganic fertilizers from atmospheric influences. Based on a risk assessment plastic coverage could be applicable. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.3 |
Inorganic fertilizers are stored in an area that is free from waste, does not constitute a breeding place for rodents and where spilling and leakage may be cleared away.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.4 |
The storage area for all inorganic fertilizers is wll ventilated and free from rainwater or heavy condensation. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.5 |
All fertilizers are stored in a manner that poses minimum risk of contamination to water sources |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.6 |
Fertilizers shall not be stored with harvested products. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.3.7 |
The stock inventory shall be updated within a month after there is movement of the stock( in and out). |
YES |
In Pantheon we have module Inventory. Goods - Stock -Inventory |
|
|
| CB 4.4 |
Organic Fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.4.1 |
No treated or untreated human sewage sludge is used ion teh farm for the production og GLOBAL G.A.P |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.4.2 |
Documented evidence is available to demonstrate that food safety and environment risk assessment for the use of organic fertilizer has been done. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.4.3 |
Organic fertilizers shall be stored in a designated ares. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.5 |
Nutrient Content of Inorganic Fertilizers |
|
|
|
|
| CB 4.5.1 |
Documented evidence/labels detailing major nutrient content is available for all fertilizers used on crops grown under GLOBAL G.A.P. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 4.5.2 |
Documented evidence detailing chemical content, including heavy metals. is available for all inorganic fertilizers used on crop |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5 |
WATER MANAGEMENT
Water is a scare natural resource and irrigation should be designed and planned by appropriate forecasting and/or by technical equipment allowing for the efficient use of irrigation water.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.1 |
Predicting irrigation Requirements |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.1.1 |
The producer can demonstrate that crop irrigation requirements are calculated based on data. Where on farm tools are in place, these should be maintained to ensure that they are effective and in a good state of repair |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.2 |
Irrigation/Fertigation management |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.2.1 |
There is documentation risk assessment that identifies environmental impacts of the water sources,distribution system and irrigation and crop washing usages.... |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.2.2 |
There is a written and implemented action plan, approved by the management within the previous 12 months.... |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.2.3 |
The producer shall keep records of the usage of crop irrigation/fertigation water that include the date, cycle duration, actual or estimated fow rate and the volume, updated on monthly basis, based on management plan and an annual total. |
NO YET |
This can be done. BUT not in near future. Integration irrigation system with Pantheon Farming. |
|
|
| CB 5.3 |
Water Quality |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.3.1 |
Untreated sewage is not used for irrigation/fertigation or for other pre-harvest activities |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.3.2 |
A risk assessment that takes into consideration, at a minimum, tha following shall be performed and documented:
- identification of the water sources and their historical testing results
- method of application
- timing of water use
- contact of water with crop
- characteristics of the crop and the growth stage
- purity of the water used for PPP
|
YES/NO |
In Pantheon we have Phrenology.
The testing results can be put it in database as scan of the document.
|
|
|
| CB 5.3.3 |
Water testing shall be part of the water management plan as directed by the water risk assessment and current sector specific standards or relevant regulations for the crop being grown. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.3.4 |
If according to the risk assessment and current sector specific standards there is a risk of contamination, the laboratory analysis provides a record of the relevant identified chemical and physical contaminants. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.3.5 |
Where required, corrective actions and documentation are available as part of the management plan as identified in the water risk assessment and current sector specific standards |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.4 |
Supply of Irrigation/Fertigation Water |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.4.1 |
There are valid permits/licenses available issued by the competent authority for all farm water usage including but not restricted to irrigation; product washing or flotation process,... |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.4.2 |
It is not unusual for specific conditions to be set in the permits/licenses, such as hourly, daily, weekly,monthly or yearly extraction volumes or usage rates. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 5.5 |
Water Storage Facilities |
|
|
|
|
| CB 5.5.1 |
Where the farm is located in areas of season water availability, there are water storage facilities for water use during periods when water availability is low. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 6 |
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT
Integrated Pest management (IPM) involves the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and the subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations, and keeps plant protection products and other interventions to levels that are economically just field and reduce or minimize risks to human heath and the environment...
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 6.1 |
Where an external adviser has provided assistance, training and technical competence shall be demonstrated via official qualifications, specific training courses, etc., unless this person has been employed for that purpose by a competent organization (e.g. official advisory services).
Where the technically responsible person is the producer, experience shall be complemented by technical knowledge (e.g. access to IPM technical literature, specific training course attendance, etc.) and/or the use of tools (software, on-farm detection methods, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 6.2 |
The producer shall show evidence of implementing al last two activities per registered crop that include the adoption of production practices that could reduce the incidence and intensity of pest attacks, and thereby reducing the need for intervention. |
YES |
In Pantheon FA we can enter for each employment the day of the last training for hygiene.This record we keep in Personal - Employee files - Health and Safety at Work |
|
|
| CB 6.3 |
The producer shall show evidence of:
a) implementing at least two activities per registered crop that will determine when and to what extent pests and their natural enemies are present, and
b) using this information to plan what pest management techniques are required.
|
|
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection - Reports |
|
|
| CB 6.4 |
The producer shall show evidence that in situations where pest attacks adversely affect the economic value of a crop, intervention with specific pest control methods will take place. Where possible, non-chemical approaches shall be considered. Not applicable when the producer did not need to intervene. |
|
Not yet. Now only for fruits and grapes |
|
|
| CB 6.5 |
When the level of a pest, disease or weed requires repeated controls in the crops, there is evidence that anti-resistance recommendations (where available) are followed. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7 |
PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS
In situations where a pest attack will adversely affect the economic value of a crop, it may be necessary to intervene using specific pest control methods, including plant protection products (PPP). The correct use, handling and storage of plant protection products are essential.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.1 |
Choice of Plant Protection Products |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.1.1 |
A list is available for the commercial brand names of plant protection products (including their active ingredient composition or beneficial organisms) that are authorized on crops being, or which have been, grown on the farm under GLOBALG.A.P. within the last 12 months. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection - Reports |
|
|
| CB 7.1.2 |
All the plant protection products applied are officially and currently authorized or permitted by the appropriate governmental organization in the country of application. Where no official registration scheme exists, refer to the GLOBALG.A.P. Guideline (Annex CB 3) on this subject as well as the FAO International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. Refer also to Annex CB 3 for cases where the producer takes part in legal field trials for final approval of PPPs by the local government. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.1.3 |
All the plant protection products applied to the crop are suitable and can be justified (according to label recommendations or official registration body publication) for the pest, disease, weed or target of the plant protection product intervention. If the producer uses an off-label PPP, there shall be evidence of official approval for use of that PPP on that crop in that country. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.1.4 |
Invoices or packing slips of all plant protection products used and/or stored shall be kept for record keeping and available at the time of the external inspection. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have module Goods where we have all issued and received invoices |
|
|
| CB 7.2 |
Advice on Quantity and Type of Plant Protection Products |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.2.1 |
Where the plant protection product records show that the technically responsible person making the choice of the plant protection products is an external qualified adviser, technical competence shall be demonstrated via official qualifications or specific training course attendance certificates. Fax and e-mails from advisers, governments, etc. are permissible.
Where the plant protection product records show that the technically responsible person making the choice of plant protection products is the producer or designated employee, experience shall be complemented by technical knowledge that can be demonstrated via technical documentation (e.g. product technical literature, specific training course attendance, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.3 |
Records of Application |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.3.1 |
Are records of all plant protection product applications kept and do they include the following minimum criteria:
- Crop name and/or variety
- Application location
- Date and end time of application
- Product trade name and active ingredient
- Pre-harvest interval |
YES |
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection - Reports |
|
|
| CB 7.3.2 |
Full name and/or signature of the responsible operator/s applying the plant protection products shall be recorded. For electronic software systems, measures shall be in place to ensure authenticity of records. If a single individual makes all the applications, it is acceptable to record the operator details only once.
If there is a team of workers doing the application, all of them need to be listed in the records. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection |
|
|
| CB 7.3.3 |
The name of the pest(s), disease(s) and/or weed(s) treated is documented in all plant protection product application records. If common names are used, they shall correspond to the names stated on the label. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection |
|
|
| CB 7.3.4 |
The technically responsible person making the decision on the use and the doses of the plant protection product(s) being applied has been identified in the records. If a single individual authorizes all the applications, it is acceptable to record this person's details only once. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection |
|
|
| CB 7.3.5 |
All plant protection product application records specify the amount of product to be applied in weight or volume or the total quantity of water (or other carrier medium) and dose in g/l or internationally recognized measures for the plant protection product. |
|
|
For now only in mobile app |
|
| CB 7.3.6 |
The application machinery type (e.g. knapsack, high volume, U.L.V., via the irrigation system, dusting, fogger, aerial, or another method) for all the plant protection products applied (if there are various units, these are identified individually) is detailed in all plant protection product application records. If it is always the same unit of application machinery (e.g. only 1 boom sprayer), it is acceptable to record the details only once. |
YES |
IIn Pantheon we have this evidence. Crop & Vegs - Tasks- Protection |
We can choose the machinery
|
|
| CB 7.3.7 |
Local weather conditions (e.g. wind, sunny/covered and humidity) affecting effectiveness of treatment or drift to neighboring crops shall be recorded for all PPP applications. This may be in the form of pictograms with tick boxes, text information, or another viable system on the record. |
|
|
Not yet. |
|
| CB 7.3.8 |
The producer shall take active measures to avoid the risk of pesticide drift from own plots to neighboring production areas. This may include, but is not limited to, knowledge of what the neighbors are growing, maintenance of spray equipment, etc |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.3.9 |
The producer shall take active measures to avoid the risk of pesticide drift from adjacent plots e.g. by making agreements and organizing communication with producers from neighboring plots in order to eliminate the risk for undesired pesticide drift, by planting vegetative buffers at the edges of cropped fields, and by increasing pesticide sampling on such fields. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.4 |
Pre-Harvest Interval (Not Applicable for Flowers and Ornamentals) |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.4.1 |
The producer shall demonstrate that all pre-harvest intervals have been complied with for plant protection products applied to the crops, through the use of clear records such as plant protection product application records and crop harvest dates. Specifically in continuous harvesting situations, there are systems in place in the field, orchard or greenhouse (e.g. warning signs, time of application etc.) to ensure compliance with all pre-harvest intervals. Refer to CB 7.6.4. |
|
|
Not jet |
|
| CB 7.5. |
Disposal of Surplus Application Mix |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.5.1 |
Applying surplus spray and tank washings to the crop is a first priority under the condition that the overall label dose rate is not exceeded. Surplus mix or tank washings shall be disposed of in a manner that does compromise neither food safety nor the environment. Records are kept. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.6 |
Plant Protection Product Residue Analysis (N/A for Flowers and Ornamental Production) |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.6.1 |
The producer or the producer's customer shall have available a list of current applicable MRLs for all market(s) in which produce is intended to be traded (domestic and/or international). The MRLs shall be identified by either demonstrating communication with clients confirming the intended market(s), or by selecting the specific country(ies) (or group of countries) in which produce is intending to be traded, and presenting evidence of compliance with a residue screening system that meets the current applicable MRLs of that country. Where a group of countries is targeted together for trading, the residue screening system shall meet the strictest current applicable MRLs in the group. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.2 |
Where the MRLs of the market in which the producer is intending to trade the produce are stricter than those of the country of production, the producer or the producer's customer shall demonstrate that during the production cycle these MRLs have been taken into account (i.e. modification where necessary of plant protection product application regime and/or use of produce residue testing results). |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.3 |
The risk assessment shall cover all registered crops and evaluate the PPP use and the potential risk of MRL exceedance.
Risk assessments normally conclude that there is a need to undertake residue analysis and identify the number of analyses, when and where to take the samples, and the type of analysis according to Annex CB 5 Maximum Residue Limit Exceedance Risk Assessment. Annex CB 5B Mandatory Minimum Criteria of a Residue Monitoring System (RMS) is obligatory.
A risk assessment that concludes that there is no need to undertake residue analysis shall have identified that there is:
- A track history of 4 or more years of analytical verification without detecting incidences (e.g. exceedances, use of non-authorized PPPs, etc.); and
- No or minimal use of PPPs; and
- No use of PPP close to harvesting (spraying to harvest interval is much bigger than the PPP pre-harvest interval); and
- A risk assessment validated by an independent third party (e.g. CB inspector, expert, etc.) or the customer.
Exceptions to these conditions could be those crops where there is no use of PPPs and the environment is very controlled, and for these reasons the industry does not normally undertake PPP residue analysis (mushrooms could be an example). |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.4 |
Based on the outcome of the risk assessment, current documented evidence or records shall be available of plant protection product residue analysis results for the GLOBALG.A.P. registered product crops, or of participation in a plant protection product residue monitoring system that is traceable to the farm and compliant with the minimum requirements set in Annex CB 5. When residue tests are required as a result of the risk assessment, the criteria relating to sampling procedures, accredited labs, etc., shall be followed. Analysis results have to be traceable back to the specific producer and production site where the sample comes from. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.5 |
Documented evidence exists demonstrating compliance with applicable sampling procedures |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.6 |
There is clear documented evidence (on letterhead, copies of accreditations, etc.) that the laboratories used for plant protection product residue analysis have been accredited, or are in the process of accreditation to the applicable scope by a competent national authority to ISO 17025 or an equivalent standard. In all cases, the laboratories shall show evidence of participation in proficiency tests (e.g. FAPAS must be available) |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.6.7 |
There is a clear documented procedure of the remedial steps and actions (this shall include communication to customers, product tracking exercise, etc.) to be taken where a plant protection product residue analysis indicates an MRL (either of the country of production or the countries in which the harvested product is intended to be traded, if different) is exceeded. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.7 |
Plant Protection Product Storage |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.1 |
The plant protection product storage facilities shall:
- Comply with all the appropriate current national, regional and local legislation and regulations.
- Be kept secure under lock and key.
- Have measuring equipment whose graduation for containers and calibration verification for scales been verified annually by the producer to assure accuracy of mixtures, and are equipped with utensils (e.g. buckets, water supply point, etc.), and they are kept clean for the safe and efficient handling of all plant protection products that can be applied. This also applies to the filling/mixing area if this is different. No N/A.
- Contain the plant protection products in their original containers and packs. In the case of breakage only, the new package shall contain all the information of the original label.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.2 |
The plant protection product storage facilities are built in a manner that is structurally sound and robust |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.3 |
The plant protection products are stored according to label storage requirements. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.4 |
The plant protection product storage facilities have sufficient and constant ventilation of fresh air to avoid a build-up of harmful vapors. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.5 |
The plant protection product storage facilities have or are located in areas with sufficient illumination by natural or artificial lighting to ensure that all product labels can be easily read while on the shelves |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.6 |
The minimum requirement is to prevent cross contamination between plant protection products and other surfaces or materials that may enter into contact with the edible part of the crop by the use of a physical barrier (wall, sheeting, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.7 |
The plant protection product storage facilities are equipped with shelving that is not absorbent in case of spillage (e.g. metal, rigid plastic, or covered with impermeable liner, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.9 |
The plant protection product storage facilities and all designated fixed filling/mixing areas are equipped with a container of absorbent inert material such as sand, floor brush and dustpan and plastic bags that must be in a fixed location to be used exclusively in case of spillage of plant protection products. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.10 |
The plant protection product storage facilities are kept locked and physical access is only granted in the presence of persons who can demonstrate formal training in the safe handling and use of plant protection products. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.11 |
Plant protection products used for purposes other than for registered and/or certified crops (i.e. use in garden etc.) are clearly identified and stored separately in the plant protection product store. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.12 |
All the plant protection products that are liquid formulations are stored on shelving that is never above those products that are powder or granular formulations |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.13 |
The stock inventory (type and amount of PPPs stored–number of units, e.g. bottles, is allowed) shall be updated within a month after there is a movement of the stock (in and out). The stock update can be calculated by registration of supply (invoices or other records of incoming PPPs) and use (treatments/applications), but there shall be regular checks of the actual content to avoid deviations with calculations. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have module Inventory. Goods - Stock -Inventory |
|
|
| CB 7.7.14 |
An accident procedure containing all information detailed in AF 4.3.1 and including emergency contact telephone numbers shall visually display the basic steps of primary accident care and be accessible by all persons within 10 meters of the plant protection product/chemical storage facilities and designated mixing areas. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.7.15 |
All plant protection product/chemical storage facilities and all filling/mixing areas present on the farm have eye washing amenities, a source of clean water at a distance no farther than 10 meters, and a first aid kit containing the relevant aid material (e.g. a pesticide first aid kit might need aid material for corrosive chemicals or alkaline liquid in case of swallowing, and might not need bandages and splints), all of which are clearly and permanently marked via signage. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.8 |
Plant Protection Product Handling |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.8.1 |
The producers provides all workers who are in contact with plant protection products the option of being voluntarily submitted to health checks annually or according to health and safety risk assessment.These health checks shall comply with national, regional or local codes of practice, and use of results shall respect the legality of disclosure of personal data. |
YES |
In Pantheon FA we can enter for each employment the day of the last training for hygiene.This record we keep in Personal - Employee files - Health and Safety at Work |
|
|
| CB 7.8.2 |
There are clear documented procedures based on the label instructions that regulate all the re-entry intervals for plant protection products applied to the crops. Special attention should be paid to workers at the greatest risk, i.e. pregnant/lactating workers, and the elderly. Where no re-entry information is available on the label, there are no specific minimum intervals, but the spray must have dried on the plants before workers re-enter the growing area. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.8.3 |
All transport of PPPs shall be in compliance with all applicable legislation. When legislation does not exist, the producer shall in any case guarantee that the PPPs are transported in a way that does not pose a risk to the health of the worker(s) transporting them. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.8.4 |
Facilities, including appropriate measuring equipment, shall be adequate for mixing plant protection products, so that the correct handling and filling procedures, as stated on the label, can be followed. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9 |
Empty Plant Protection Product Containers |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9.1 |
Pressure-rinsing equipment for plant protection product containers shall be installed on the plant protection product application machinery or there shall be clear written instructions to rinse each container at least 3 times prior to its disposal.
Either via the use of a container-handling device or according to a written procedure for the application equipment operators, the rinsate from the empty plant protection product containers shall always be put back into the application equipment tank when mixing, or disposed of in a manner that does compromise neither food safety nor the environment.
|
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9.2 |
There is evidence that empty plant protection product containers have not been or currently are not being re-used for anything other than containing and transporting identical product as stated on the original label. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.9.3 |
There is a designated secure store point for all empty plant protection product containers prior to disposal that is isolated from the crop and packaging materials (i.e. permanently marked via signage and locked, with physically restricted access for persons and fauna). |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9.4 |
Producers shall dispose of empty plant protection product containers using a secure storage point, a safe handling system prior to the disposal, and a disposal method that complies with applicable legislation and avoids exposure to people and the contamination of the environment (watercourses, flora and fauna). |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9.5 |
Where official collection and disposal systems exist, there are records of participation by the producer. All the empty plant protection product containers, once emptied, shall be adequately stored, labeled, handled, and disposed of according to the requirements of the official collection and disposal schemes, where applicable. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.9.6 |
All the relevant national, regional and local regulations and legislation, if such exist, have been complied with regarding the disposal of empty plant protection product containers. |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.10 |
Obsolete Plant Protection Products |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.10.1 |
There are records that indicate that obsolete plant protection products have been disposed of via officially authorized channels. When this is not possible, obsolete plant protection products are securely maintained and identifiable. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 7.11 |
Application of Substances other than Fertilizer and Plant Protection Products |
|
|
|
|
| CB 7.11.1 |
If homemade preparations, plant strengtheners, soil conditioners, or any other such substances are used on certified crops, records shall be available. These records shall include the name of the substance (e.g. plant from which it derives), the trade name (if purchased product), the field, the date, and the amount. If in the country of production a registration scheme for this substance(s) exists, it has to be approved.
Where the substances do not require registration for use in the country of production, the producer shall make sure that the use does not compromise food safety. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 8 |
EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
| CB 8.1 |
The equipment is kept in a good state of repair with documented evidence of up-to-date maintenance sheets for all repairs, oil changes, etc. undertaken.
E.g.:
Plant protection product sprayers: See Annex CB.6 for guidance on compliance with visual inspection and functional tests of application equipment. The calibration of the plant protection product application machinery (automatic and non-automatic) has been verified for correct operation within the last 12 months and this is certified or documented either by participation in an official scheme (where it exists) or by having been carried out by a person who can demonstrate their competence.
If small handheld measures not individually identifiable are used, then their average capacity has been verified and documented, with all such items in use having been compared to a standard measure at least annually.
Irrigation/fertigation equipment: As a minimum, annual maintenance records shall be kept for all methods of irrigation/fertigation machinery/techniques used. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have module Fixed asset where we can se the history of services of the machinery |
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 8.2 |
The equipment used is kept in a good state of repair with documented evidence of up-to-date maintenance sheets for all repairs, oil changes, etc. undertaken.
E.g.: Fertilizer spreader: There shall exist, as a minimum, records stating that the verification of calibration has been carried out by a specialized company, supplier of fertilization equipment or by the technically responsible person of the farm within the last 12 months.
If small handheld measures not individually identifiable are used, then their average capacity has been verified and documented, with all such items in use having been compared to a standard measure at least annually. |
YES |
In Pantheon we have module Fixed asset where we can se the history of services of the machinery. |
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 8.3 |
The producer's involvement in a calibration scheme is documented. In the case the producer uses an official calibration system cycle longer than one year, the producer still requires internal annual verification of the calibration as per CB 8.1. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
|
| CB 8.4 |
The equipment used in the application of plant protection products (e.g. spray tanks, knapsacks) is stored in a secure way that prevents product contamination or other materials that may enter into contact with the edible part of the harvested products. |
|
|
|
|