No. |
Control Point - description |
In Pantheon (Yes/No) |
Link to user manual in Pantheon |
Option |
FV 1 |
SITE MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
FV 1.1 |
Risk Assessment |
|
|
|
FV 1.1.1 |
As part of their risk assessment for the farm site (see AF 1.2.1.), producers shall identify the locations of nearby commercial animal operations, composting and potential sources for ingress by domestic and wild animals, and other contamination routes such as floodwater intrusion and dust. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 1.1.2 |
A management plan addresses the risks identified in FV 1.1.1 and describes the hazard control procedures that justify that the site in question is suitable for production. This plan shall be appropriate to the products being produced and there shall be evidences of its implementation and effectiveness. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 2 |
SOIL MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
FV 2.1 |
Soil Fumigation |
|
|
|
FV 2.1.1 |
There is written evidence and justification for the use of soil fumigants including location, date, active ingredient, doses, method of application and operator. The use of Methyl Bromide as a soil fumigant is not permitted. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 2.1.2 |
Pre-planting interval shall be recorded |
NO |
|
|
FV 3 |
SUBSTRATES |
|
|
|
FV 3.1 |
The producer keeps records documenting quantities recycled and dates. Invoices/loading dockets are acceptable. If there is no participation in a recycling program available, it should be justified. |
YES/NO |
We can keep records only for invoices. |
|
FV 3.2 |
When the substrates are sterilized on the farm, the name or reference of the field, orchard or greenhouse is recorded. If sterilized off farm, then the name and location of the company that sterilizes the substrate are recorded. The following are all correctly recorded: the dates of sterilization (day/month/year), the name and active ingredient, the machinery (e.g. 1000l-tank, etc.), the method (e.g. drenching, fogging, etc.), the operator’s name (i.e. the person who actually applied the chemicals and did the sterilization), and the pre-planting interval |
YES/NO |
For now we can record only field.
Settings - Agricultural Holdinga Fields
|
|
FV 3.3 |
Records exist that attest the source of the substrate of natural origin being used. These records demonstrate that the substrate does not come from designated conservation areas. |
|
|
|
FV 4 |
PRE-HARVEST (Refer to Annex FV 1 GLOBALG.A.P. Guideline - Microbiological Hazards) |
|
|
|
FV 4.1 |
Quality of Water Used on Pre-Harvest Activities (this applies to water used on all farm activities and on the product itself before it is harvested). |
|
|
|
FV 4.1.1 |
A written risk assessment of microbiological quality of the water is conducted. It includes water source, proximity to potential sources of contamination, application timing (growth stage of the crop), application method, and placement of application (harvestable part of the crop, other parts of the crop, ground between crops, etc.). |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 4.1.2 |
GLOBALG.A.P. producers shall comply with the local applicable limits for microbiological contaminants in the water used on pre-harvest activities, and in their absence use the WHO recommendations as a reference for the decision making process for preventive and/or corrective actions (see Annex FV1). Compliance with the applicable thresholds shall be verified through water tests carried out in a frequency as indicated by the decision tree in Annex FV1 (risk assessment).
Water testing regime shall reflect the nature and extent of the water system as well as the type of product. Where substantiallly different water sources are used, they shall be considered separately with regard to sampling. Where one water source services multiple systems or farms it may be possible to treat this as the single origin for sampling purposes.
Samples from field level shall be taken from places that are more representative of the water source, usually as close to the point of application as possible.
|
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 4.1.3 |
When the risk assessment based on the water testing indicates risks of product contamination, action shall be required.
Possible strategies to reduce the risk of product contamination arising from water use include, but are not limited to:
- Treating water before use.
- Preventing water coming into contact with the harvestable portion of the crop.
- Reducing the vulnerability of the water supply.
- Allowing sufficient time between application and harvest to ensure an appropriate decline in pathogen populations.
Producers implementing these strategies shall have an adequate and reliable validation process to demonstrate that product contamination is being avoided.
|
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 4.1.4 |
Analyses are carried out by an appropriate laboratory accredited against ISO 17025 or equivalent standard and capable of performing microbiological analyses, or by laboratories approved for water testing by the local competent authorities. |
|
|
|
FV 4.2 |
Application of Organic Fertilizer of Animal Origin |
|
|
|
FV 4.2.1 |
Records show that the interval between use of composted organic fertilizers and harvest does not compromise food safety (see also CB 4.4.2).
When raw animal manure is used, it shall be incorporated into the soil:
- for tree crops, prior to bud burst, or exceptionally it may be incorporated in a shorter interval based on a risk assessment (CB 4.4.2) but never shorter than 60 days prior to harvest.; (for tree crops),
- for all other crops: at least 60 days prior to harvest for all other crops. In the case of leafy greens (also called potherbs, greens, vegetable greens, leafy greens, or salad greens) it cannot be applied after planting even if the growing cycle is longer than 60 days.
Refer to FV Annex 1
|
YES |
In Pantheon we have tasks when we do fertilization Fruit&Nuts - Tasks - Reports |
|
FV 4.3 |
Pre-Harvest Check |
|
|
|
FV 4.3.1 |
Appropriate measures shall be taken to reduce possible contamination within the growing area. Example subjects to be considered include: livestock near the field, high concentrations of wildlife in the field, rodents, and domestic animals (own animals, dog walkers, etc.). Where appropriate buffer areas, physical barriers, fences should be used. |
|
|
|
FV 5 |
HARVEST AND POST-HARVEST (PRODUCT HANDLING) ACTIVITIES
Control points covered in FV 5.1.1. to FV 5.8.10 may be applicable during harvest and/or handling at the point of harvest (on field) and/or handling in packinghouse (facility) and/or during storage/cooling. All these points shall be evaluated in all cases when and where applicable. |
|
|
|
|
Four main activities may take place after the growing season: harvest, handling at the point of harvest (on field), handling in a packinghouse (in facility), and storage/cooling. Although not all of these activities are carried out on every farm, the need to follow the appropriate hygiene principles and to maintain the tools, equipment and facilities are common and equally important for all these activities with regard to food safety. Producers shall evaluate the requirements aggregated in this section considering all the applicable activities on the farm. |
|
|
|
FV 5.1 |
Principles of Hygiene (Refer to Annex FV 1 GLOBALG.A.P. Guideline - Microbiological Hazards) |
|
|
|
FV 5.1.1 |
There is a documented hygiene risk assessment covering physical, chemical and microbiological contaminants, spillage of bodily fluids (e.g. vomiting, bleeding), and human transmissible diseases, customized to the products and processes. It shall cover all harvest and product handling activities carried out by the producer, as well as personnel, personal effects, equipment, clothing, packaging material and product storage (also short-term storage at farm).
The hygiene risk assessment shall be tailored to the activities of the farm, the crops, and the technical level of the business and be reviewed every time risks change and at least annually
|
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.1.2 |
Based on the risk assessment, there are documented hygiene procedures for the harvesting and post-harvesting processes. Procedures shall include evaluating whether workers are fit to return to work after illness. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.1.3 |
The operation shall nominate the farm manager or other competent person as responsible for the implementation of the hygiene procedures by all workers and visitors.
When the risk assessment determines that specific clothing (e.g. smocks, aprons, sleeves, gloves, footwear–see Annex FV 1, 5.4.2) shall be used, it shall be cleaned when it becomes soiled to the point of becoming a risk of contamination, and shall be effectively maintained and stored.
Visual evidence shows that no violations of the hygiene instructions and procedures occur
|
YES |
In Pantheon FA we can enter for each employment the day of the last training for hygiene.This record we keep in Personal - Employee files - Health and Safety at Work |
|
FV 5.1.4 |
There shall be evidence that the workers received specific induction and annual training regarding the hygiene procedures for the harvesting and product handling activities. Workers shall be trained using written (in appropriate languages) and/or pictorial instructions to prevent physical (e.g. snails, stones, insects, knives, fruit residues, watches, mobile phones, etc.), microbiological and chemical contamination of the product during harvesting. Training records and evidence of attendance shall be available. |
YES |
In Pantheon FA we can enter for each employment the day of the last training for hygiene.This record we keep in Personal - Employee files - Health and Safety at Work |
|
FV 5.1.5 |
Signs with the main hygiene instructions shall be visibly displayed in the relevant locations and include clear instructions that hands shall be washed before handling produce. Workers handling ready to eat products shall wash their hands prior to start of work, after each visit to a toilet, after handling contaminated material, after smoking or eating, after breaks, prior to returning to work, and at any other time when their hands may have become a source of contamination. |
|
|
|
FV 5.1.6 |
Smoking, eating, chewing and drinking are confined to designated areas away from crops awaiting harvest and are never permitted in the produce handling or storage areas, unless indicated otherwise by the hygiene risk assessment. (Drinking water is the exception). |
|
|
|
FV 5.2 |
Sanitary Facilities |
|
|
|
FV 5.2.1 |
Wash stations shall be available and maintained (hand soap, towels) in a clean and sanitary condition to allow workers to clean their hands. Personnel shall wash their hands prior to start of work; after each visit to a toilet; after handling contaminated material; after smoking, or eating; after breaks; prior to returning to work; and at any other time when their hands may have become a source of contamination.
Water used for hand washing shall at all times meet the microbial standard for drinking water. If this is not possible, sanitizer (e.g. alcohol based gel) shall be used after washing hands with soap and water with irrigation water quality.
Hand-washing stations shall be provided inside or close to toilet facilities.
|
|
|
|
FV 5.2.2 |
Field sanitation units shall be designed, constructed, and located in a manner that minimizes the potential risk for product contamination and allows direct accessibility for servicing. Fixed or mobile toilets (including pit latrines) are constructed of materials that are easy to clean and they are in a good state of hygiene. Toilets are expected to be in a reasonable proximity (e.g. 500m or 7 minutes) to place of work. Failure point = no or insufficient toilets in reasonable proximity to place of work. Not applicable is only possible when harvest workers don’t come in contact with marketable produce during harvesting (e.g. mechanical harvesting). Toilets shall be appropriately maintained and stocked.
(For guidance, see Annex FV 1, 5.4.1) |
|
|
|
FV 5.2.3 |
Hand washing facilities, containing non-perfumed soap, water to clean and disinfect hands, and hand-drying facilities shall be accessible and near to the toilets (as near as possible without the potential for cross-contamination). Workers shall wash their hands prior to start of work; after each visit to a toilet; after using a handkerchief/tissue; after handling contaminated material; after smoking, eating or drinking, after breaks; prior to returning to work; and at any other time when their hands may have become a source of contamination. When handling takes place in a facility, toilets shall be maintained in a good state of hygiene, and shall not open directly onto the produce handling area, unless the door is self-closing. |
|
|
|
FV 5.2.4 |
Reusable harvesting containers, harvesting tools (e.g. scissors, knives, pruning shears, etc.) and harvesting equipment (e.g. machinery) are cleaned and maintained. A documented cleaning (and, when indicated by the risk assessment, disinfection) schedule is in place to prevent produce contamination.
Produce containers are only used to contain harvested product (i.e. no agricultural chemicals, lubricants, oil, cleaning chemicals, plant or other debris, lunch bags, tools, etc.).
|
|
|
|
FV 5.2.5 |
The changing facilities should be used to change clothing and protective outer garments as required. |
|
|
|
FV 5.3 |
Water Quality |
|
|
|
FV 5.3.1 |
Any ice or water used in relation to harvest or cooling shall meet microbial standards for drinking water and shall be handled under sanitary conditions to prevent produce contamination. The only exception is in the case of cranberry fields that are harvested by flooding, where producers shall at a minimum guarantee that the water is not a source of microbiological contamination. |
|
|
|
FV 5.4 |
Packing and Storage Areas |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.1 |
All harvested produce (regardless stored bulk or packed) shall be protected from contamination.
In the case of produce packed and handled directly in the field, it shall all be removed from the field during the day (not stored on the field overnight in open-air conditions), in accordance with the harvest hygiene risk assessment results. Food safety requirements shall be complied with if produce is stored on a short time basis at the farm. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.4.2 |
To prevent contamination, all on- and off-farm storage and produce handling facilities and equipment (i.e. process lines and machinery, walls, floors, storage areas, etc.) shall be cleaned and/or maintained according to a documented cleaning and maintenance schedule that includes defined minimum frequency. Records of cleaning and maintenance shall be kept. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.4.3 |
Packaging material used shall be appropriate for the food safety of the products packed. To prevent product contamination, packing materials (including re-useable crates) shall be stored in a clean and hygienic area. |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.4 |
Bits of packaging material and non-produce waste shall be removed from the field. |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.5 |
To avoid chemical contamination of produce, cleaning agents, lubricants etc. shall be kept in a designated secure area, away from produce |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.6 |
Documented evidence exists (i.e. specific label mention or technical data sheet) authorizing use for the food industry of cleaning agents, lubricants etc. that may come into contact with produce. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.4.7 |
Internal transport should be maintained in a manner to avoid produce contamination, with special attention to fume emissions. Forklifts and other driven transport trolleys should be electric or gas-driven. |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.8 |
Produce that poses a microbial food safety hazard is not harvested or is culled.
Culled produce and waste materials are stored in clearly designated and segregated areas designed to avoid contamination of products. These areas are routinely cleaned and/or disinfected according to the cleaning schedule. Only daily accumulations of rejected produce and waste materials are acceptable.
|
|
|
|
FV5.4.9 |
In case of breakage, light bulbs and fixtures suspended above produce or material used for produce handling are of a safety type or are protected/shielded so as to prevent food contamination. |
|
|
|
FV 5.4.10 |
Written procedures exist for handling glass and/or clear hard plastic breakages, which could be a source of physical contamination and/or damage the product (e.g. in greenhouses, produce handling, preparation and storage areas). |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.5 |
Temperature and Humidity Control |
|
|
|
FV 5.5.1 |
If produce is stored either on-farm or in a packinghouse, temperature and humidity controls (where necessary to comply with quality requirements and also for controlled atmosphere storage) shall be maintained and documented. |
NOT YET |
In future we can connect with Pantheon |
|
FV 5.6 |
Pest Control |
|
|
|
FV 5.6.1 |
Producers shall implement measures to control pest populations in the packing and storing areas appropriate to the farm condition |
YES |
In pantheon we have Pest monitoring. |
|
FV 5.6.2 |
A visual assessment shows that the pest monitoring and correcting process are effective. |
YES |
In pantheon we have Pest monitoring. |
|
FV 5.6.3 |
Monitoring is scheduled and there are records of pest control inspections and follow-up action plan(s). |
YES |
In pantheon we have Pest monitoring. |
|
FV 5.7 |
Post-Harvest Washing |
|
|
|
FV 5.7.1 |
The water has been declared suitable by the competent authorities and/or a water analysis has been carried out at the point of entry into the washing machinery within the last 12 months. The levels of the parameters analyzed are within accepted WHO thresholds or are accepted as safe for the food industry by the competent authorities. |
|
|
|
FV 5.7.2 |
Where water is re-circulated for final produce washing, it is filtered and disinfected, and pH, concentration and exposure levels to disinfectant are routinely monitored. Records are maintained. Filtering shall be done using an effective system for solids and suspensions that have a documented routine cleaning schedule according to usage rates and water volume. Where recording of automatic filter backwash events and changes in dosage rates by automated sanitizer injectors may be impossible, a written procedure/policy shall explain the process. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.7.3 |
The water analysis for the product washing is undertaken by a laboratory currently accredited to ISO 17025 or its national equivalent or one that can demonstrate via documentation that it is in the process of gaining accreditation. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.8 |
Post-Harvest Treatments |
|
|
|
FV 5.8.1 |
There are clear procedures and documentation available, (e.g. application records for post-harvest biocides, waxes and plant protection products) that demonstrate compliance with the label instructions for chemicals applied. |
|
|
|
FV 5.8.2 |
All the post-harvest biocides, waxes and plant protection products used on harvested crop are officially registered or permitted by the appropriate governmental organization in the country of application. They are approved for use in the country of application and are approved for use on the harvested crop to which they are applied as indicated on the labels of the biocides, waxes and crop protection products. Where no official registration scheme exists, refer to the GLOBALG.A.P. Guideline (CB Annex 3 PPP Product Use in Countries that Allow Extrapolation) on this subject and the FAO International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. |
|
|
|
FV 5.8.3 |
An up-to-date documented list that takes into account any changes in local and national legislation for biocides, waxes and plant protection products is available for the commercial brand names (including any active ingredient composition) that are used as post-harvest plant protection products for produce grown on the farm under GLOBALG.A.P. within the last 12 months. |
NO |
|
Scan the document in to documentation system in Pantheon |
FV 5.8.4 |
The technically responsible person for the post-harvest biocides, waxes and plant protection products applications can demonstrate a sufficient level of technical competence via nationally recognized certificates or formal training. |
YES |
In Pantheon FA we can enter for each employment the day of the last training for hygiene.This record we keep in Personal - Employee files - Health and Safety at Work |
|
FV 5.8.5 |
The water has been declared suitable by the competent authorities and/or within the last 12 months a water analysis has been carried out at the point of entry into the washing machinery. The levels of the parameters analyzed are within accepted WHO thresholds or are accepted as safe for the food industry by the competent authorities. |
|
|
|
FV 5.8.6 |
To avoid the chemical contamination of the produce, biocides, waxes and plant protection products etc. are kept in a designated secure area, away from the produce. |
|
|
|
FV 5.8.7 |
The following information is recorded in all records of post-harvest biocide, wax and plant protection product applications:
- The lot or batch of harvested crop treated.
- The geographical area, the name or reference of the farm, or harvested crop-handling site where the treatment was undertaken.
- The exact dates (day/month/year) of the applications.
- The type of treatment used for product application (e.g. spraying, drenching, gassing etc.).
- The complete trade name (including formulation) and active ingredient or beneficial organism with scientific name. The active ingredient shall be recorded or it shall be possible to connect the trade name information to the active ingredient.
- The amount of product applied in weight or volume per liter of water or other carrier medium. |
NOT YET |
In the future |
|
FV 5.8.8 |
The name of the operator who has applied the plant protection product to the harvested produce is documented in all records of post-harvest biocide, wax and plant protection product applications. |
NOT YET |
In the future |
|
FV 5.8.9 |
The common name of the pest/disease to be treated is documented in all records of post-harvest biocide, wax and plant protection product applications. |
NOT YET |
In the future |
|
FV 5.8.10 |
There is documented evidence to demonstrate that the producer considers all post-harvest biocides and plant protection products applications under Control Point CB 7.6, and acts accordingly. |
NOT YET |
In the future |
|